When
Doctor Who began, its plan was to have three different kinds of stories: sci-fi
adventures in the future, historical trips to the past, and finally stories
that sort of go… sideways. “Edge of Destruction” and “Planet of Giants” were
both “sideways” stories, although I would argue that “Destruction” fulfilled
that remit a lot more successfully. “The Space Museum” begins as a story that
goes sideways, and begins brilliantly I might add, and then Episodes Two, Three
and Four happen.
But,
let’s start at the beginning. Episode One has a similar tone “The Edge of
Destruction,” and this is by no means a bad thing. There is suspense, surrealism, and a general
foreboding that has all of the TARDIS crew on edge throughout the episode. When
the end comes, our four travelers come face to face with themselves as displays
in the museum and it’s a genuinely disturbing moment. How could this happen?
How will they escape? How CAN they escape if it hasn’t happened to them yet? It’s
a great cliffhanger moment, and sadly, one which is horribly let down by the
three episodes that follow.
To
be fair, the questions that the cliffhanger asks are answered pretty close to immediately.
That is also one of the problems. Once the explanation of “the TARDIS jumped a
time track” is given, then the rest of the story has each member of the crew
questioning whether what they do (or don’t do) is what leads them to their fate
as an exhibit. This could have been a great surreal episode, questioning fate
and destiny, and I could easily see how if this were a two-parter it would have
been similar to the far superior “Edge of Destruction.” Unfortunately what
actually happens is that the TARDIS team gets caught up in one of the most
pitiful rebellions against the most ridiculous oppressors. Three episodes are
devoted to the Xeron rebellion, and although there are some good moments, the
story never fulfills the promise of that first episode.
In
one of the DVD’s special features, author Robert Shearman (“Dalek” amongst many
others) rightly praises Episode One, but hypothesizes that the whole story is
meant to be a comedy, a pastiche of the kind of story which Doctor Who usually
does. The Moroks are meant to be a bunch of clods, and the Xerons are a group
of beatniks in black jeans and tennis shoes. I just can’t agree. I want to, I really
do, if only to help sustain the promise of Episode One. But I just don’t see
it. There is comedy to be sure—Vicki as the spark that lights the flame of rebellion,
the Doctor’s ability to outwit the mind scanner with ridiculous images. Ian
gets a good line or two although he’s a bit whiny about the “What do we do???”
business. Barbara, comes off the worst as she really doesn’t HAVE much to do.
If this was meant to be a comedy, a la “The Romans,” it could have easily been
played as farce or parody. But the earnestness of all involved isn’t the
earnestness of those who are in on the joke. The guest cast, including a VERY
pre-Boba Fett Jeremy Bulloch, is so sincere that laughing at this as a comedy
would just seem cruel.
“The
Space Museum” is by no means horrible, but it commits the major crime of simply
being dull. The promise of the first episode is broken by the subsequent ones.
I wish it *had* been a comedy, or at the very least a knowing pastiche of the
traditional Doctor Who story, just to give a little more depth to the
proceedings. But alas, it was not to be. Much like “An Unearthly Child”, “The
Space Museum” starts out strong but is hampered by the other episodes that make
up the whole tale. It’s not the nadir of Doctor Who, just an unfortunate
sideways misstep.
NEXT EPISODE: The Chase
I have seen "The Space Museum" exactly once, and I enjoyed it immensely, probably because it was the very last Hartnell I had left to see (at least until they found that episode of "Galaxy Four.") Someday soon I'll have to watch it with a more discerning eye. Until then, I can only view it as that rare wonder: an episode I'd never seen before.
ReplyDelete